The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-2429•Lorene Williams v. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. CA-98-1063-A
99-2429Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 25, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2429
LORENE WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
D. E. VORBAU, Fairfax County Police Officer
Badge Number 2245; FAIRFAX COUNTY POLICE
DEPARTMENT, Mount Vernon District Station;
FAIRFAX COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER
WICKER, Officer, Fairfax County Police,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-98-1063-A)
Submitted: March 28, 2000 Decided: April 25, 2000
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lorene Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Everett Rose, III,
COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lorene Williams appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Williams v. Vorbau, No. CA-98-1063-A (E.D.
Va. Sept. 13, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.