The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-2404•William J. Healey v. Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, Pc
99-2404Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 14, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2404
WILLIAM J. HEALEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT,
PC; NORMAN F. OBLON; MARVIN J. SPIVAK; C.
IRVIN MCCLELLAND; GREGORY J. MAIER; ARTHUR I.
NEWSTADT; MARC R. LABGOLD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge.
(CA-99-1105)
Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 14, 2000
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William J. Healey, Appellant Pro Se. Paul James Kennedy, LITTLER
MENDELSON, Washington, D.C.; Stephen William Robinson, MCGUIRE,
WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., McLean, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William J. Healy appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his civil action. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Because the district court properly found that Healy lacks standing
to bring this action, we affirm.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.