The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-2355•Kelly Miskin v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation
99-2355Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 1, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2355
KELLY MISKIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; MENTOR CORPORA-
TION, a Minnesota Corporation,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Paul W. Grimm, Magistrate Judge. (CA-92-
2975-WMN)
Submitted: March 31, 2000 Decided: May 1, 2000
Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas A. Gentile, Harry W. Goldberg, Jonathan J. Goldberg, Chevy
Chase, Maryland, for Appellant. Diane E. Lifton, BROBECK, PHLEGER
& HARRISON, L.L.P., New York, New York, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kelly Miskin appeals from the magistrate judge’s order grant-
ing summary judgment to Baxter Healthcare Corporation on her prod-
ucts liability action. Our review of the record and the magistrate
judge’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Miskin v.
Baxter Healthcare Corp., No. CA-92-2975-WMN (D. Md. Sept. 17,
1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.