The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-2316•Carol H. Abercrombie v. ROBERT M. WALKER, Secretary, Department of the Army
99-2316Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 28, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2316
CAROL H. ABERCROMBIE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT M. WALKER, Secretary, Department of the
Army,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98-
3082-MJG)
Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carol H. Abercrombie, Appellant Pro Se. Roann Nichols, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carol H. Abercrombie appeals the district court's order grant-
ing summary judgment to the Defendant on Abercrombie's reprisal
discrimination claim. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Abercrombie v.
Walker, CA-98-3082-MJG (D. Md. Aug. 30, 1999). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.