The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-2269•Judith E. Selig v. Louis P. Batson Company
99-2269Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 14, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2269
JUDITH E. SELIG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LOUIS P. BATSON COMPANY; BATSON YARN & FABRIC
MACHINERY GROUP,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-98-1495-6-13AK)
Submitted: February 29, 2000 Decided: March 14, 2000
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Judith E. Selig, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip Arthur Kilgore, Michael
Stuart Pitts, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, Greenville,
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Judith E. Selig appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to Defendants in this action alleging violations
of the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the rec-
ord and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Selig v.
Louis P. Batson Co., No. CA-98-1495-6-13AK (D.S.C. Aug. 20, 1999).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.