G. Bryant Gibbs, a resident of Cumberland County, North Carolina v. the Kelly Springfield/goodyear Tire

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2211
G. BRYANT GIBBS, a resident of Cumberland
County, North Carolina,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE KELLY SPRINGFIELD/GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER
COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 99-2383
G. BRYANT GIBBS, a resident of Cumberland
County, North Carolina,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE KELLY SPRINGFIELD/GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER
COMPANY, of Fayetteville, NC; UNITED STEEL-
WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 959; THE INTERNA-
TIONAL UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
No. 99-2384
G. BRYANT GIBBS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE INTERNATIONAL UNITED STEELWORKERS OF
AMERICA; UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL
959, Local 959 of Cumberland County,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
(CA-98-868-5-F(3), CA-99-24-5-F, CA-99-67-5-F)
Submitted: February 29, 2000 Decided: March 14, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
G. Bryant Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se. Richard W. Wiggins, MCCOY,
WEAVER, WIGGINS, CLEVELAND & RAPER, Fayetteville, North Carolina;
Joseph P. Stuligross, UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania; Melinda Lawrence, PATTERSON, HARKAVY & LAWRENCE,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s orders denying his
motion to compel discovery, granting Kelly-Springfield/Goodyear
Tire and Rubber Company’s motion to dismiss, and granting summary
judgment in favor of the International Steelworkers Union of
America and the United Steelworkers of America Local 959. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and order and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Gibbs v. Kelly-Springfield/Goodyear
Tire and Rubber Co., No. CA-98-868-5-F(3); Gibbs v. International
United Steelworkers of Am., Nos. CA-99-24-5-F; CA-99-67-5-F
(E.D.N.C. Aug. 4, Aug. 31, Sept. 30 & Oct. 7, 1999). We deny
Gibbs’ motion to reconsider our denial of his motion to amend the
caption. We further deny his motion to incorporate additional doc-
uments into the record. See 4th Cir. R. 10(e). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --