The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-2043•Stella L. Arcaro v. Alicia H. Smith, individually
99-2043Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 17, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2043
STELLA L. ARCARO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ALICIA H. SMITH, individually, and as a Police
Officer and Agent for the Town of Christians-
burg; TOWN OF CHRISTIANSBURG, A Virginia
Municipal Corporation,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-97-59-7)
Submitted: January 31, 2000 Decided: February 17, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
B.K. Cruey, Shawsville, Virginia, for Appellant. Elizabeth K.
Dillon, GUYNN & DILLON, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stella L. Arcaro appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We
have reviewed the briefs, the joint appendix, and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af-
firm on the reasoning of the district court. See Arcaro v. Smith,
No. CA-97-59-7 (W.D. Va. July 14, 1999). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.