The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
98-4910•United States of America v. Paul Franklin Hoover
98-4910Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 20, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-4910
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
PAUL FRANKLIN HOOVER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CR-96-21-BO)
Submitted: June 8, 1999 Decided: January 20, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Arthur Webb, Federal Public Defender, Edwin C. Walker,
Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-
pellant. Janice McKenzie Cole, United States Attorney, Anne M.
Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Paul Franklin Hoover appeals the district court’s order re-
voking his supervised release and sentencing him to eighteen months
of imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. See United States v.
Hoover, No. CR-96-21-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 25, 1998). Accordingly, we
affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.