The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
97-6460•United States of America v. Herman Wooden
97-6460Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 25, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6460
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HERMAN WOODEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CR-90-18, CA-96-1591-AM)
Submitted: April 28, 2000 Decided: May 25, 2000
Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herman Wooden, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Herman Wooden seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-
ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability, deny Wooden’s motions for appointment of counsel,
and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. Wooden, No. CR-90-18; CA-96-1591-AM (E.D. Va. Mar.
7, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.