Santos De Jesus Henriquez Parada v. U.s. Immigration & Naturalization Service

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2725
SANTOS DE JESUS HENRIQUEZ PARADA,
Petitioner,
versus
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE;
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A28-073-338)
Submitted: March 18, 2003 Decided: April 28, 2003
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles D. Yates, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Robert D.
McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Julia K. Doig, Senior
Litigation Counsel, Francesco Isgro, Senior Litigation Counsel,
Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* Because we find that the Board properly found Henriquez
Parada to be deportable for failure to show that he applied for and
received consent to reenter the United States after his prior
deportation, we decline to reach the issue of whether the Board
properly found that Henriquez Parada was also deportable on the
ground that he lacked a valid immigrant visa.
2
PER CURIAM:
Santos de Jesus Henriquez Parada seeks review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) decision and order dismissing his
appeal from the immigration judge’s order finding him deportable
and denying his application for adjustment of status. We have
reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s decision and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for
review substantially on the reasoning of the Board. See Henriquez
Parada v. INS, No. A28-073-338 (B.I.A. Nov. 19, 1997). * We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --