Clayton T. Jones v. Officer Chris E. Odom

20-6486United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th CircuitJul 28, 2020

Full text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6486

CLAYTON T. JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OFFICER CHRIS E. ODOM,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (3:19-cv-03326-TMC)

Submitted: July 23, 2020 Decided: July 28, 2020

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clayton T. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:

Clayton T. Jones appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and dismissing Jones’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint under 28
U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b) (2018). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones
v. Odom, No. 3:19-cv-03326-TMC (D.S.C. Mar. 25, 2020). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.