Freddy Famba v. Rite Aid of Maryland, Inc.

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1069

FREDDY FAMBA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RITE AID OF MARYLAND, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Stephanie A. Gallagher, District Judge. (1:18-cv -03091-SAG)

Submitted: June 24, 2020 Decided: July 20, 2020

Before FLOYD, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Freddy Famba, Appellant Pro Se. Ariana K. DeJan-Lenoir, Zachary Lee Erwin,
ANDERSON, COE & KING, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:
Freddy Famba appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to
Famba’s former employer, Rite Aid of Maryland, Inc. (“Rite Aid”), in his employment
discrimination action. Specifically, Famba asserted disability discrimination and failure-
to-accommodate claims pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 12101 to 12213 (2018), and the Maryland Fair Employment Practices Act, Md. Code
Ann., State Gov’t §§ 20-601 to 20-611 (2014 & Supp. 2019), based on Rite Aid’s alleged
failure to accommodate Famba’s post-surgical lifting and postural limitations and later
terminating Famba’s employment as a warehouse stocker.
Upon review of the summary judgment record, we discern no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the grant of summary judgment for the reasons stated by the district
court. Famba v. Rite Aid of Md., Inc., No. 1:18-cv-03091-SAG (D. Md. Dec. 19, 2019).
We deny Famba’s request for the appointment of counsel on appeal. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED