The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-7377•Artis Eugene Slade v. Donna M. Smith
19-7377Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 20, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7377
ARTIS EUGENE SLADE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
DONNA M. SMITH,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:18-hc-02115-BO)
Submitted: December 17, 2019 Decided: December 20, 2019
Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Artis Eugene Slade, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Artis Eugene Slade, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and denying his motion to appoint counsel.* We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Slade v.
Smith, No. 5:18-hc-02115-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 2019). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Slade confines his appeal to the district court’s ruling dismissing his petition.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.