Darrell Williams v. Bryan Stirling; Officer Wiggins; Warden Randall Williams

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7315

DARRELL WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BRYAN STIRLING; OFFICER WIGGINS; WARDEN RANDALL WILLIAMS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (2:18-cv-01690-CMC)

Submitted: April 16, 2020 Decided: May 28, 2020

Before HARRIS and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrell J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Gordon Wade Cooper, BUYCK, SANDERS &
SIMMONS, LLC, Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:
Darrell J. Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint without
prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. On appeal, we confine our review
to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Williams’ informal
brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir.
2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our
review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED