Michael Alexander Collins v. State of South Carolina

19-7279United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th CircuitJun 18, 2020

Full text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7279

MICHAEL ALEXANDER COLLINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; AIKEN COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT; SHANNON STURGILL; JENNIFER LAIRD; DAVID HAZE;
DOYET A. EARLY, III; MONTFORD SHULER CAUGHMAN; VICKI J.
SNELGROVE; WILLIAM P. KEESLEY; EVERETT K. CHANDLER; ASHLEY
HAMMOCK; DEPUTY BAKER; DEPUTY WILSON; NURSE SHERRY; NURSE
ANGEL; DEPUTY MOORE; NURSE ROBIN; CPL PERRY; DEPUTY PRINCE;
SGT BRADLEY; DEPUTY MCDUFFIE; DEPUTY NIGHTINGALE; DEPUTY
GIBSON; DEPUTY POWELL; DEPUTY JONES; NURSE AMANDA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (8:18-cv-02596-MGL)

Submitted: June 16, 2020 Decided: June 18, 2020

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Alexander Collins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Alexander Collins appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Collins’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2018) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Collins v. South Carolina, No. 8:18-
cv -02596-MGL (D.S.C., Sept. 4, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.