The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-7038•Anthony Bussie v. 408 Union - North Carolina; 409 Union - North Carolina; J. Mull
19-7038Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 22, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7038
ANTHONY BUSSIE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
408 UNION - NORTH CAROLINA; 409 UNION - NORTH CAROLINA;
J. MULL,
Respondent - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District pf North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:17-hc-02217-FL)
Submitted: November 19, 2019 Decided: November 22, 2019
Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Bussie, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Bussie, a federal civil committee, appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bussie v. 408 Union - North Carolina,
No. 5:17-hc-02217-FL (E.D.N.C. July 2, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.