The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-7020•Douglas R. Vaughn v. Deputy Pidea; Deputy Denton
19-7020Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 7, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7020
DOUGLAS R. VAUGHN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPUTY PIDEA; DEPUTY DENTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00564-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: November 1, 2019 Decided: November 7, 2019
Before THACKER, RICHARDSON, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas R. Vaughn, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Douglas R. Vaughn appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failing to comply with a court order under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vaughn v. Pidea, No.
1:19-cv-00564-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. filed July 2, 2019 & entered July 3, 2019). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
* Although Vaughn contends that he submitted the forms required by the district
court to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, the required forms have not been filed in
this case.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.