The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-6729•Robert Earl Tippens, Jr. v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA D.O.C.
19-6729Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 8, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6729
ROBERT EARL TIPPENS, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VA D.O.C.,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-00784-HEH-RCY)
Submitted: September 30, 2019 Decided: October 8, 2019
Before WILKINSON and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Earl Tippens, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Earl Tippens, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated
by the district court. Tippens v. Clarke, No. 3:17-cv-00784-HEH-RCY (E.D. Va. Apr. 23,
2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.