The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1803•Mark Downey v. United States of America
19-1803Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 17, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1803
MARK DOWNEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:19-cv-01872-PX)
Submitted: October 15, 2019 Decided: October 17, 2019
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark Downey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mark Downey appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Downey v. United States, No. 8:19-cv-01872-PX (D.
Md. July 8, 2019). We deny Downey’s motion for a nationwide public ruling to quash
federal and state sovereign immunity. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.