The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1470•Dr. Cynthia Fisher v. Walgreen Co.
19-1470Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 18, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1470
DR. CYNTHIA FISHER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WALGREEN CO.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Asheville. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (1:17-cv-00225-MOC-WCM)
Submitted: October 8, 2019 Decided: October 18, 2019
Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cynthia Fisher, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly S. Hughes, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH
SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cynthia Fisher appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment
discrimination complaint and denying leave to amend. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Fisher leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Fisher v.
Walgreen Co., No. 1:17-cv-00225-MOC-WCM (W.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 2019). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.