William G. Clowdis, Jr. v. Joel Jeremy Silverman, M.d.

19-1442Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 15, 2019

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1442
WILLIAM G. CLOWDIS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOEL JEREMY SILVERMAN, M.D.; MCV ASSOCIATED PHYSICIANS, d/b/a
MCV Physicians; WILLIAM L. HARP, M.D.; JENNIFER L. DESCHENES, J.D.,
M.S.; LORETTA S. HOPSON-BUSH; DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
PROFESSIONS VIRGINIA BOARD OF MEDICINE; THE VIRGINIA HEALTH
PRACTITIONER'S MONITORING PROGRAM; NATIONAL PRACTITIONER
DATABASE; VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY;
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH
UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM; AMY STEWART; SHERRY FOSTER, R.N.,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
SANDRA WHITLEY RYALS; RENEE S. DIXSON,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:15-cv-00128-REP)
Submitted: August 14, 2019 Decided: November 15, 2019
Before WYNN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William G. Clowdis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia; Erin
Laura Barrett, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,
Virginia; Laura May Hooe, Shyrell Antwinique Reed, MORAN, REEVES & CONN, PC,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
William G. Clowdis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’
motions to dismiss. Clowdis also appeals the denial of his motions to vacate and to amend.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Clowdis v. Silverman, No. 3:15-cv-00128-REP (E.D.
Va. Mar. 28, 2019). We deny Clowdis’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.