Cristina Gonzalez Bautista; A.Y.E.G. v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1218

CRISTINA GONZALEZ BAUTISTA; A.Y.E.G.,

Petitioners,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: May 22, 2020 Decided: June 1, 2020

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Janeen Hicks-Pierre, PIERRE LAW, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Petitioner.
Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director,
Thankful T. Vanderstar, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:

Cristina Gonzalez Bautista and her minor daughter, both natives and citizens of
Mexico, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)
dismissing their appeal from the Immigration Judge’s decision denying Gonzalez
Bautista’s application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have considered
Gonzalez Bautista’s claims after thoroughly reviewing the record and conclude that the
record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings,
see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2018), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s
decision, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
See In re Gonzalez Bautista (B.I.A. Feb. 12, 2019). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED