The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6369•Terrell Joyner v. KAREN J. BURRELL, Judge, City of Norfolk, VA
18-6369Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 26, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6369
TERRELL JOYNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KAREN J. BURRELL, Judge, City of Norfolk, VA; MAGISTRATE, City of
Norfolk, VA; EVERETT MARTIN, Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:17-cv-00666-MSD-LRL)
Submitted: June 21, 2018 Decided: June 26, 2018
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terrell Roshad Joyner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Terrell Joyner appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012).
We have reviewed the record and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Joyner v. Burrell, No. 2:17-cv-00666-MSD-LRL (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2018). We deny
Joyner’s motions for a transcript at government’s expense and for a stay. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.