United States of America v. Wainsworth Marcellus Hall, a/k/a Unique

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6291
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WAINSWORTH MARCELLUS HALL, a/k/a Unique,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-1)
Submitted: July 19, 2018 Decided: July 23, 2018
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wainsworth Marcellus Hall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Wainsworth Marcellus Hall appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion
for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), and denying his motion
to supplement the record. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.* United States v. Hall,
No. 2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 1, 2018 & Mar. 7, 2018). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal conclusions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* To the extent Hall’s motion challenged the drug amount attributed to him at
sentencing, such claim is not properly raised in a § 3582 motion. United States v. Stewart,
595 F.3d 197, 201 (4th Cir. 2010) (noting § 3582 proceeding is “not considered a full
resentencing by the court”).

-- 2 of 2 --