The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6214•Donald Ray Pevia, Jr. v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONS; JEFFREY NINES, Acting Warden; SHARON BAUCOM, M.D.
18-6214Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 23, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6214
DONALD RAY PEVIA, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONS; JEFFREY NINES, Acting Warden;
SHARON BAUCOM, M.D.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00631-ELH)
Submitted: July 19, 2018 Decided: July 23, 2018
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Ray Pevia, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donald Ray Pevia, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pevia v.
Comm’r of Corr., No. 1:17-cv-00631-ELH (D. Md. Feb. 20, 2018). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.