The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6178•United States of America v. Francisco Salinas-Castillo
18-6178Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 30, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6178
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
FRANCISCO SALINAS-CASTILLO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cr-00188-REP-4)
Submitted: May 24, 2018 Decided: May 30, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Francisco Salinas-Castillo, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Francisco Salinas-Castillo appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se
motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Salinas-Castillo, No. 3:10-cr-
00188-REP-4 (E.D. Va. Feb. 6, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.