The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6147•United States of America v. Monstsho Eugene Vernon
18-6147Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 24, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6147
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MONSTSHO EUGENE VERNON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:01-cr-00239-HMH-3)
Submitted: April 19, 2018 Decided: April 24, 2018
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monstsho Eugene Vernon, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Monstsho Eugene Vernon appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion
for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny Vernon’s
motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.