The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6128•United States of America v. Edward Lee Lewis
18-6128Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 3, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6128
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
EDWARD LEE LEWIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia,
at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, District Judge. (2:02-cr-00042-1)
Submitted: April 30, 2018 Decided: May 3, 2018
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Lee Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. James Matthew Davis, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Edward Lee Lewis appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions to
resentence and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Lewis, No. 2:02-cr-00042-1 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 22, 2018). The motions for appointment of
counsel and to place the case in abeyance are denied. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.