The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6072•John Carroll v. JOE COAKLEY, Warden
18-6072Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 18, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6072
JOHN CARROLL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JOE COAKLEY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia,
at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00126-IMK-RWT)
Submitted: June 14, 2018 Decided: June 18, 2018
Before TRAXLER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Carroll, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Carroll, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on
his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition, denying as moot his motion to expedite, and
denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Carroll v. Coakley, No. 1:17-cv-00126-IMK-
RWT (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 15, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.