The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6038•United States of America v. Daren Kareem Gadsden, a/k/a D
18-6038Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 30, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6038
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAREN KAREEM GADSDEN, a/k/a D,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:11-cr-00302-CCB-3)
Submitted: May 24, 2018 Decided: May 30, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daren Kareem Gadsden, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Daren Kareem Gadsden appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Gadsden, No.
1:11-cr-00302-CCB-3 (D. Md. Jan. 2, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.