The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6031•Nicole Chantell Banks v. Department of Corrections
18-6031Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 3, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6031
NICOLE CHANTELL BANKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:17-cv-00404-MFU-RSB)
Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018
Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nicole Chantell Banks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nicole Chantell Banks appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for
leave to amend her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Banks v. Dep’t of Corr., No. 7:17-cv-00404-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.