Shannon Andre Peters v. Stephanie Hollembaek

18-6011Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 30, 2018

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6011
SHANNON ANDRE PETERS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
STEPHANIE HOLLEMBAEK,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:16-hc-02049-BO)
Submitted: May 24, 2018 Decided: May 30, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shannon Andre Peters, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Shannon Andre Peters, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Peters v. Hollembaek, No.
5:16-hc-02049-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.