The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6010•Savino Braxton v. United States of America
18-6010Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 4, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6010
SAVINO BRAXTON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cv-00601-JKB)
Submitted: April 24, 2018 Decided: May 4, 2018
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Savino Braxton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Savino Braxton appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of
error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Braxton v. United
States, No. 1:17-cv-00601-JKB (D. Md. Dec. 14, 2017). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.