The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-1334•James Joseph Owens-El v. State of Maryland; City of Baltimore; Pamela Howerll Cab Co.
18-1334Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 25, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1334
JAMES JOSEPH OWENS-EL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND; CITY OF BALTIMORE; PAMELA HOWERLL CAB
CO.,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cv-03057-JKB)
Submitted: June 21, 2018 Decided: June 25, 2018
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Joseph Owens-El, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Joseph Owens-El appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his
mandamus petition for want of jurisdiction and denying his motion for reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Owens-El v. Maryland, No. 1:17-cv-03057-JKB (D.
Md. Nov. 9, 2017 & Mar. 5, 2018). We deny the motion for the court to intervene and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.