The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-1305•Kristian Taguinod v. Amazon.com Inc.
18-1305Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 30, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1305
KRISTIAN TAGUINOD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AMAZON.COM INC.,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
INTEGRITY STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC.; MAHMOUD OMARI; MALIK
OMARI,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:17-cv-00276-HEH)
Submitted: May 24, 2018 Decided: May 30, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kristian Taguinod, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kristian Taguinod appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint,
filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17
(West 2012 & Supp. 2017), as time-barred, and denying reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Taguinod v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 3:17-cv-00276-HEH
(E.D. Va. Aug. 11, 2017 & Mar. 15, 2018). We also deny Taguinod’s motion to assign
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.