The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-1246•Esther M. Yates; William R. Yates v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
18-1246Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 23, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1246
ESTHER M. YATES; WILLIAM R. YATES,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC; COMMONWEALTH TRUSTEES, LLC;
RUHI FATIMA MIRZA; ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, LLC; US BANK
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; DOES 1 THROUGH 50, being parties to be named
later as and when known,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:17-cv-01376-AJT-JFA)
Submitted: July 19, 2018 Decided: July 23, 2018
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Esther M. Yates, William R. Yates, Appellants Pro Se. Jessica Anne Clark, Virginia
Beach, Virginia, Dennis Kyle Deak, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Raleigh, North
Carolina; Sara Nicholson Tussey, ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Vienna,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Esther and William Yates (“the Yateses”) appeal the district court’s order granting
Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss the Yateses’ removed civil
action in which the Yateses asserted a variety of claims stemming from Defendants’
actions related to the Yateses’ mortgage on their home. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Yates v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, No. 1:17-cv-01376-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. Jan.
31, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.