The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-1116•Kristy J. Downing v. JOSEPH MATAL, Performing the Functions
18-1116Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 29, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1116
KRISTY J. DOWNING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOSEPH MATAL, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Director of the
United States Patent and Trademark Office,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01511-LO-MSN)
Submitted: May 24, 2018 Decided: May 29, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kristy J. Downing, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca Sara Levenson, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kristy J. Downing appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her discrimination
and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42
U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2017), against the former interim
Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Joseph Matal. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Downing v. Matal, No. 1:16-cv-01511-LO-MSN (E.D.
Va., filed July 18, 2017 & entered July 19, 2017; filed Dec. 12, 2017 & entered Dec. 13,
2017; filed Jan. 22, 2018 & entered Jan. 23, 2018). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.