The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-7629•United States of America v. Percy James Tucker
17-7629Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 23, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7629
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PERCY JAMES TUCKER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:09-cr-00182-AWA-DEM-1)
Submitted: May 3, 2018 Decided: May 23, 2018
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Percy James Tucker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Percy James Tucker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny the pending motion for release and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
See United States v. Tucker, No. 2:09-cr-00182-AWA-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 4, 2017).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.