The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-7201•Ton Julius Thomas v. ARMSTEAD, Warden; DAMION FAYALL; N. RAJA, Officer CO Two; DR. NERO, Director
17-7201Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 2, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7201
TON JULIUS THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ARMSTEAD, Warden; DAMION FAYALL; N. RAJA, Officer CO Two; DR.
NERO, Director,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:16-cv-02737-CCB)
Submitted: March 20, 2018 Decided: May 2, 2018
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ton Julius Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Conrad Meister, Gina Marie Smith,
MEYERS, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ton Julius Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
summary judgment, granting Appellees’ motion for summary judgment, and denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Thomas v. Armstead, No. 1:16-cv-02737-CCB (D. Md. filed Aug. 28, 2017, & entered
Aug. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.