The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-7098•United States of America v. Carlton A. Edwards
17-7098Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 24, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7098
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CARLTON A. EDWARDS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cr-00100-REP-RCY-1)
Submitted: October 19, 2017 Decided: October 24, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carlton A. Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Arthur Garnett, Assistant United States
Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carlton A. Edwards appeals the district court’s order denying relief on Edwards’
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Edwards, No. 3:11-cr-00100-REP-RCY-1 (E.D. Va.
July 25, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.