The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6919•Richie Leo Williams v. GORDON F. WILLIS, Circuit Court Judge
17-6919Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 3, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6919
RICHIE LEO WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GORDON F. WILLIS, Circuit Court Judge; TARA BETH COLEMAN, Attorney;
FREDERICKSBURG CIRCUIT COURT; KEVIN D. GROSS, Assistant
Commonwealth Attorney; KING GEORGE COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY'S
OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00173-CMH-IDD)
Submitted: September 28, 2017 Decided: October 3, 2017
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richie Leo Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Richie Leo Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Williams v. Willis, No. 1:17-cv-00173-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va.
June 30, 2017). We also deny Williams’ motions to correct the record and to amend the
complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.