The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6899•United States of America v. Maurice Antwaun Mcknight, a/k/a Weezie, a/k/a Wee
17-6899Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 28, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6899
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MAURICE ANTWAUN MCKNIGHT, a/k/a Weezie, a/k/a Wee,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (4:12-cr-00063-TLW-1)
Submitted: September 26, 2017 Decided: September 28, 2017
Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Maurice Antwaun McKnight, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant
United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United
States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Maurice Antwaun McKnight seeks to appeal the district court’s order disposing of
the Government’s post-judgment motion. We lack jurisdiction to review the district
court’s order and, thus, dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.