The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6897•United States of America v. Eric Martin Vanburen
17-6897Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 24, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6897
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ERIC MARTIN VANBUREN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (3:00-cr-00066-NKM-1)
Submitted: October 19, 2017 Decided: October 24, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Martin Van Buren, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States
Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eric Martin VanBuren appeals the district court’s orders denying his most recent
attempts for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny VanBuren’s self-styled motion for leave to file a Rule (d)
motion and affirm the district court’s orders. See United States v. VanBuren, No. 3:00-cr-
00066-NKM-1 (W.D. Va. June 27, 2017 & July 6, 2017). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.