The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6836•United States of America v. Victor Perkins
17-6836Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 24, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6836
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner - Appellee,
v.
VICTOR PERKINS,
Respondent - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:92-hc-00654-BR)
Submitted: October 19, 2017 Decided: October 24, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor Bernard Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. Robert J. Dodson, Special Assistant United
States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jennifer Dee Dannels, FEDERAL MEDICAL
CENTER, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Victor Perkins appeals from the district court’s order denying his pro se motion to
vacate the November 6, 1992, order committing him to the custody and care of the
Attorney General pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246(d) (2012). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Perkins, No. 5:92-hc-00654-BR (E.D.N.C. June 7, 2017). We
also deny Perkins’ motions for summary disposition, to appoint counsel, for default
judgment, and for bail. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.