The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6823•William C. Pumphrey v. JOE COAKLEY, Complex Warden
17-6823Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 20, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6823
WILLIAM C. PUMPHREY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JOE COAKLEY, Complex Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00199-IMK-MJA)
Submitted: October 17, 2017 Decided: October 20, 2017
Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William C. Pumphrey, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Erin Carter Tison,
Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William C. Pumphrey, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Pumphrey’s 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pumphrey v. Coakley,
No. 1:16-cv-00199-IMK-MJA (N.D.W. Va. June 21, 2017). We further deny as moot
Pumphrey’s motion to expedite decision. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.