The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6818•United States of America v. Devon Raymus Sturdivant
17-6818Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 29, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6818
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DEVON RAYMUS STURDIVANT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:06-cr-00194-RJC-1)
Submitted: August 24, 201 Decided: August 29, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Devon Raymus Sturdivant, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United
States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Gretchen C. F. Shappert, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Devon Raymus Sturdivant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Sturdivant, No. 3:06-cr-00194-RJC-1 (W.D.N.C. June 2, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.