The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6799•United States of America v. Christian Diamond Byrd, a/k/a Diamond
17-6799Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 29, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6799
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHRISTIAN DIAMOND BYRD, a/k/a Diamond,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:14-cr-00455-TDC-1)
Submitted: August 24, 2017 Decided: August 29, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christian Diamond Byrd, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah A. Johnston, Assistant United States
Attorney, Thomas Patrick Windom, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christian Diamond Byrd appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Byrd, No. 8:14-cr-00455-TDC-1 (D. Md. June 5, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.