The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6784•Oliver M. Boling v. United States of America
17-6784Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 20, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6784
OLIVER M. BOLING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (4:17-cv-01097-CMC)
Submitted: October 17, 2017 Decided: October 20, 2017
Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Oliver M. Boling, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Oliver M. Boling, a District of Columbia prisoner, appeals the district court’s
order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing without prejudice
Boling’s complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (2012), for
failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Boling v.
United States, No. 4:17-cv-01097-CMC (D.S.C. June 7, 2017). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.