The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6651•United States of America v. Jeffrey A. Martinovich
17-6651Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 7, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6651
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JEFFREY A. MARTINOVICH,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 17-6652
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JEFFREY A. MARTINOVICH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (4:12-cr-00101-AWA-RJK-1;
4:15-cr-00050-AWA-LRL-1)
Submitted: October 30, 2017 Decided: November 7, 2017
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Before DUNCAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey A. Martinovich, Appellant Pro Se. V. Kathleen Dougherty, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia; Kevin Patrick Hudson, Brian James
Samuels, Assistant United States Attorneys, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey A. Martinovich appeals the district court’s orders correcting his restitution
orders. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Martinovich, Nos.
4:12-cr-00101-AWA-RJK-1; 4:15-cr-00050-AWA-LRL-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 14, 2017;
Apr. 6, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.