The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6550•Manuel Perez-Colon v. TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden
17-6550Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 15, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6550
MANUEL PEREZ-COLON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia,
at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:14-cv-00066-GMG-MJA)
Submitted: July 27, 2017 Decided: August 15, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Manuel Perez-Colon, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Erin Carter Tison,
Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Manuel Perez-Colon, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Perez-
Colon’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Perez-Colon v. O’Brien, No. 3:14-cv-
00066-GMG-MJA (N.D. W. Va. Apr. 12, 2017). We further deny Perez-Colon’s motion
to consolidate. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.